|
A
Modified Soave Procedure through a Posterior Sagittal
Approach for Hirschsprung’s Disease
Nguyen
Thanh Liem, Bui Duc Hau, Hoang Boi Son
National
Hospital of Pediatrics, Vietnam
Purpose:
To describe the surgical technique and early clinical
results of a modified Soave procedure through the posterior
sagittal approach (PSAP) for Hirschsprung disease.
Methods:
The patient was placed in a prone jack- knife position.The
rectum was approached through PSAP keeping the external
sphincter intact.The rectum was isolated , then divided
approximately 2 cm from the dentate line. The rectum and
sigmoid were freed up to the normal segment. The aganglionic
segment and ganglion segment was confirmed during the
operation by the frozen biopsy.The aganglionic segment and
trasitional zone was removed. The rectal mucosectomy started
1cm proximal to the dentate line leaving 1cm of the muscular
cuff. Coloanal anastomosis was fashioned 1 cm proximal to
the dentate line.
Results:
From January 2000 to December 2001,73 patients
were operated on by the above technique. The age ranged from
1 month to 36 months.The aganglionic segment was located in
the rectum in 46 patients, and in the sigmoid in
27 patients. The average length of bowel resected was
20 cm ( ranged from 10 cm to 35 cm). Combined laparotomy or
lapraroscopic surgery was carriet out in 3 patients. There
were no operative or postoperative deaths
Anastomotic leakage occurred in 2 patients .
Spontanous defecation was achieved in all patients.
Conclusion:
PAPS provides an excellent exposure of the operative
field compare to the transanal approach , and decrease the
major complications seen with the abdominal approach. The
modified Soave procedure can easily be performed through
PAPS .
Key words:
Hirschsprung disease, modified Soave procedure, Posterior
sagittal apprroach.
Corerspondent:
Nguyen Thanh Liem
Adress:
National Hospital of Pediatrics, 18/879 Lathanh Road, Hanoi,
Vietnam
Email: nipliem@hotmail.com
Tl: 84-4-8352615
Fax: 84-4-7 754 448
Introduction
A modified
technique through the posterior sagittal approach(PAPS) was
systematically used for anorectal malformations in our
department (1 ). Since January 2000, a modified Soave
operation through PAPS was used for Hirschsprung disease.
The purpose of this paper was to describe the surgical
technique and initial results.
Materials and methods
96
patients with Hirschsprung’s disease were operated upon
from January 2000 to July 2002 by the same surgical team.
The diagnosis was
confirmed by the intraoperative frozen biopsy.
The
operation was perfomed with the patient in a prone
jack-knife position.An incision of the cutanous and
subcutaneous planes was made from the sacrococcygeal
junction to approximately 1 cm from the mucocutanous
junction. then extended laterally 1 cm on each side. The
incision was continued untill the external sphincter is
visible. The coccyx was removed. The dissection on the
midline above the external sphincter is continued to the
puborectalis. The anococcygeal ligament is divided, then the
puborectalis was pulled
down by a retractor to exposure the rectum. The diagnosis
was confirmed by a frozen-section biopsy specimen from the
distal rectum.A traction suture was placed on the posterior
wall of the rectum and then the rectum was gradually
mobilized by division of vessels and bands posteriorally and
laterally up to the peritoneal reflection.A small
peanut was passed through the space between the rectum and
the vagina or the urethra.. The distal rectum was divided
2cm above the dentate line. The proximal rectal stump was
closed. The dissection was continued up to the transition
zone through to the normal
colon. A second frozen biopsy was taken to confirm
the presence of ganglionic
cells..
Lonestar retractor was placed to exposure the anus then the
mucosa of the distal rectum was dettached from the dentate
line. The colon was pull through, divided at the ganglionic
level, and then the colo-anal anastomosis was fashioned 1 cm
above the dentate line.
Excess colon can
be left when the surgeon worried about the security of the
anastomosis. All patients in our series were seen in the
clinic 3 weeks postoperatively and then at regular 3- 6
months intervals.
Results
From January
2000 to December 2001, 96 patients
were operate on by this technique, including 84 boys and 12
girls. The age ranged from 1 month to 36 months ( table 1):
Table 1: Age distribution
|
Age
|
Number
|
Percentage
|
|
1-12 months
|
60
|
62.5
|
|
13-24 months
|
21
|
21.9
|
|
25- 36 months
|
15
|
15.6
|
The
aganglionic segment was located in the rectum in
56 patients,
in the sigmoid in 40 patients (table 2)
Table 2:
site of aganglionic segment
|
Site
of aganglionic segment
|
Number
|
Percentage
|
|
Rectum
|
56
|
58.3
|
|
one/third lower sigmoid
|
22
|
22.9
|
|
two/third lower sigmoid
|
18
|
18.8
|
.The length of resected bowel
ranged from 10 cm to 35 cm (table 3):
Table 3: the
length of resected bowel
|
Length of resected bowel
|
Number
|
percentage
|
|
10- 20 cm
|
24
|
25.0
|
|
21- 30 cm
|
67
|
69.8
|
|
> 30 cm
|
5
|
5.2
|
Combined laparotomy
was carriet out in 2 patients and assisted
laparoscopy in one patient. There was no operative and
postoperative death.
Anastomotic leakage occurred in
2 patients . Spontanous defecation was achieved in
all patients
Discussion
The
abdominal approach is the traditional one for Hirschsprung
disease(2,3,4). . However different
approach have been used ( 5,6,7,8,9). The PSAP has several
important advantages
compared with the traditional abdominal
approach. The PSAP provides an excellent exposure of
the anal canal and rectum. The dissection can be performed
more accurate, with less trauma to the adjacent organs due
to direct visualization.
The approach allows the surgeon to avoid
complications of the abdominal approach such as
herniation, and intestinal obstruction. The patient recovers
more quickly with less pain.
Compared with
Hedlund’s technique, our technique has some
differences:
-
The external sphincter complex is completely
preserved which
minimizes the risk of fecal incontinence.
-
The anastomosis is fashioned according to a Soave’s
modified method, rather than a straight anastomosis. We
believe that the anastomosis on the pectinate area with a
short muscular sleeve could be safer and has better blood
supply by inferior hemorrhoid artery.
Compared with the transanal approach (8,9), the PSAP
provides better visibility, the internal sphincter is less
traumatized since the strong retraction of the anus is not
applied.
In
this study, the PAPS was used successfully
not only for rectal aganglionosis but also for the
sigmoid aganglionosis. The combined abdominal approach or
laparoscopy were only necessary in three cases.
We have not
followed the patients long enough yet short to evaluate a
complete function but after the operation all patients had
spontaneous defecation .
The results
from this study show that the modified Soave operation
through PAPS is a good alternative approach in the surgery
of HD, and can be used for both the rectal and sigmoid
aganlinonois.
References
1. Liem NT,
Hau BD.Long-term follow-up results of the treatment of high
and intermediate anorectal malformations using a modified
technique of posterior sagittal anorectoplasty. Eur J Peditr
Surg 2001;11:242-245.
2. Swenson
O, Neuhauser EBD, Pickett LK. New concepts of the etiology,
diagnosis and treatment of congenital megacolon. Pediatrics
1949;4:201-209.
3. Duhamel
B. Une nouvelle operation pour le megacolon congenital.
L’abaissement retrorectal et transanal du colon et son
application possible au traitement de quelques autres
malformation. Presse Med 1956;64:2249-2250
4. Soave F.
A new surgical technic for treatment of Hirschsprung
disease. Surgery 1964;56:1007-10014.
5. Hedlund
H. Posterior sagittal resection for rectal aganglinonosis:
preliminary results of a new approach. J Pediatr Surg
1997,32:1717-1720.
6. Posterior
sagittal abdominoperineal pull-through : a mew approach to
definitive treatment of Hirschsprung disease- initial
experience. J Pediatr Surg 1999;34:572-574.
7. Georgeson
KE, Cohen RD, Hebra A, et al. Primary laparoscopic-assisted
endorectal colon pull-through for Hirschsprung’s disease:
a new gold standard. Ann Surg 1999; 229:678-682
8. Shankar
KR, Losty PD, Lamont GL,et al. Transanal endorectal coloanal
surgery for Hirschsprung’s disease: experience in two
centers. J Pediatr Surg 2000;35:1209-1213.
9. De le
Torre L, Ortega A. Transanal versus open endorectal
pull-through for Hirschsprung’s disease. J Pediatr Surg
2000; 35:1630-1632.
Back
|